The Son of Man must suffer many things, and be rejected by the elders and the chiefs priests and the scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise up.There's a distinction there between the suffering he expected to endure and his actual death. This understanding is supported by the other four usages of the verb paschein in the synoptic gospels, which all describe the suffering of other people in circumstances that will not lead to death. But it didn't take long before Christians began describing the period of suffering between the garden of Gethsemane and the crucifixion as "The Passion" and this usage was clearly understood by Christians for several centuries.
Of course, the English word "passion" (which comes from the Greek paschein and Latin passio) is used very differently today. We rarely if ever use it to describe suffering outside the context of Christian theology. Instead, we use the word to describe intense feeling, usually positive, especially though not exclusively in romantic contexts. No one would question me being, say, passionate about my wife, but I could also be passionate about my work or my faith so long as I have a deep felt sense of my commitment to both.
It seems to me that this new meaning is having a significant impact on our understanding of the suffering and death of Jesus. Because we describe the suffering and death as "The Passion" we can't help but hear it as being deeply connected to the love that Jesus has for humanity, perhaps even as an expression of that love. This certainly isn't a bad thing, but it's a connection that's made so easy for us because of the way our language has developed, which is certainly a happy accident!
It also leads me to wonder. If we understand the word "passion" in this way it seems to me that we could use it more broadly for the life of Jesus as a whole. We could easily understand the entire ministry of Jesus as "The Passion", an expression of the deep felt sense he had about his purpose in the world and the love that he had for all people. I say that not to take away from the very real suffering he endured at the end of his life, but rather to highlight the fact that the suffering is intimately connected to the way he lived.
No comments:
Post a Comment